Token base of the Ethereum base $ kekkius agreement
I'm reaching you because I found a problem with my Ethereum contract, 0xbb1b725e34d2d3b6a4127130890b3d62a19e743. Despite having a qualified $ kekius company, I could not hold other events of other accounts.
The problem is that the contract allows you to change and send tokens to basecan, but there is no mention or warning on the platform. This led me to question whether the issue is the issue of the contract or is just a misunderstanding.
Inspection to agree
I realized when checking the contract code that it seems to be well designed and safe. However, I noticed some differences in the implementation of the identification change function. Particularly:
- The "Change" feature takes two arguments: the sender's address and the destination account address.
- The "Change" function will verify if the sender has a sufficient balance of the basic ID and the change of the toy to complete the event.
Possible reasons for the question
Based on my research, I identified a series of possible reasons why the contract does not work as expected:
Token equilibrium questions
: It is possible that the balance of the basic ID or the replaced beam is not sufficient.
2
Basican restrictions : Although I have checked Basoscan, it seems that there are no explicit restrictions on the exchange and sending of the contract.
The following steps
To solve this problem, I would like to ask for instructions. Here are some of the steps I would like to do:
- Can you provide more information about your contract experience? Have you ever tried the flawed steps?
- Are there error messages or specific notices that appear when trying to send and receive the tokens?
- Would it be possible to update the contract code or implement a correction to solve this problem?
Your help to solve this problem would be much appreciated. If you cannot find a solution, I will consider Ethereum developers or community resources for more instructions.
Thanks for your time and attention!